Re: fine art reproduction questions
Re: fine art reproduction questions
- Subject: Re: fine art reproduction questions
- From: Ben Goren <email@hidden>
- Date: Sun, 2 May 2010 14:50:04 -0700
On 2010 May 2, at 2:41 PM, Andrew Rodney wrote:
> I said that depending on the raw processing engine its not possible because, if you would again read the ICC article, these processors only produce output referred.
So, your point is that, if one uses inadequate tools designed for a different job that nobody actually uses or is considering using, you won't be able to do the job?
And that's somehow worth wasting everybody's bandwidth because...why, exactly?
>> Heck, for that matter, *DO* you now or have you ever done copy work?
>
> Yup.
So? How? What's your workflow? Do you use those raw processing engines that aren't designed for the job? If so, how do you compensate? If not, what do you use instead? And what kind of results do you get?
Or are you only interested in confusing people with random irrelevant whining about how hard it is?
Cheers,
b&
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden