RE: SWOPv2 is dead
RE: SWOPv2 is dead
- Subject: RE: SWOPv2 is dead
- From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>
- Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2015 14:50:56 -0500
> I've been hearing this print shop group complain about (many) of their customers inability to provide data as they desire
> for years, decades.
What's the complain about, Andrew?
You write :
> If the issue is the wrong flavor of CMYK, supply one.
Do you know this to be the issue or is this speculation?
> You seem to be quite certain that every mangled image you get passed through the hands of Adobe Photoshop for one
> AND even if so (doubtful), man up and aid your customers in providing the data you need or reject it, or print it and blame
> them for sending you data that's unacceptable for output.
Oddly enough, the presumption for the fault always lie with the printer. Believe me, clients rarely for their mistakes.
> Do something besides expect that a chagne in a default will slove any of the above issues.
I'm doing something about it! I caution people against the ills of SWOPv2 anytime I get the chance.
Again, I'm not bashing Adobe. I'm only advocating that things need improvements.
Best / Roger
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden