Re: Spectrolino repair
Re: Spectrolino repair
- Subject: Re: Spectrolino repair
- From: Ray Cheydleur <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 13:46:28 +0000
- Thread-topic: Spectrolino repair
Graeme is precisely correct, the KM FD series, i1 Pro2 and i1iSis 2 are using a modeling process (as does Argyle and i1Profilers OBA module), the eXact uses instead an approach using filtered Tungsten with additional sources in the UV to provide the spectral power distribution at the measurement plane. Either approach is completely valid for OBA’s as they are well studied and modeled. The issue comes when you look at other potential fluorescing agents. Then the model may, or very likely may not, perform as expected and thus the eXact is the better choice for these more complex situations.
RayC
Ray Cheydleur
Printing and Imaging Product Portfolio Manager
email@hidden
Roger Breton wrote:
please forgive my technical ignorance but is there anything fundamentally wrong or flawed in the following approach :
It's a modeling approach, the same in principle as used by ArgyllCMS FWA compensation,
and the i1pro2 M1/M2. You calibrate for the media's fluorescent response by
measuring with the instrument light sources, and then use a model to predict how it
will look under a real D50 spectrum.
Graeme Gill.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden