• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag
 

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: WO Licence interpretation (again)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: WO Licence interpretation (again)


  • Subject: Re: WO Licence interpretation (again)
  • From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 10:31:48 -0800


On Dec 4, 2008, at 7:58 AM, David Avendasora wrote:


On Dec 4, 2008, at 10:18 AM, Miguel Arroz wrote:

Hi!

WHAT!? Plasma TVs? Satellites? Noooooo.... anything with chips and transistors is strictly not allowed in the WebObjects refugee camp! Only the good old nature and perhaps some light bulbs and switches so we can read a good book at night...

WHAT? Books? Lights? Nooo!!! Books trigger flash backs of reading PWO over and over again.

Poor Dave's lips were so sore after all that reading!


It's goats, beer and BBQ only for me. Not necessarily in that order, or serially for that matter.

Mmmm BBQ goat.


If I don't already know it or can't puzzle it out for myself, it ain't getting done.

Dave

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


-- Chuck Hill Senior Consultant / VP Development

Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific problems.
http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects







_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden
References: 
 >Re: About instance's integrity. (was Re: Webobjects-dev Digest, Vol 5, Issue 1141) (From: Lachlan Deck <email@hidden>)
 >Re: About instance's integrity. (was Re: Webobjects-dev Digest, Vol 5, Issue 1141) (From: Ken Anderson <email@hidden>)
 >WO Licence interpretation (again) (From: Q <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WO Licence interpretation (again) (From: Miguel Arroz <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WO Licence interpretation (again) (From: Q <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WO Licence interpretation (again) (From: Pascal Robert <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WO Licence interpretation (again) (From: Don Lindsay <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WO Licence interpretation (again) (From: Miguel Arroz <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WO Licence interpretation (again) (From: David Avendasora <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: OSC's in background intensive-EOF threads
  • Next by Date: Re: Baffling problem with foreign key
  • Previous by thread: Re: WO Licence interpretation (again)
  • Next by thread: Re: WO Licence interpretation (again)
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread