Re: why aren't xibs the default?
Re: why aren't xibs the default?
- Subject: Re: why aren't xibs the default?
- From: "Finlay Dobbie" <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 11:57:00 +0000
On Dec 9, 2007 10:00 PM, Bill Bumgarner <email@hidden> wrote:
> On Dec 9, 2007, at 1:02 PM, Rick Mann wrote:
> >> They aren't the default because many people depend on building on a
> >> Tiger based machine.
> >
> > That doesn't seem to make sense. Aren't .xibs an Xcode 3 feature,
> > and doesn't Xcode 3 require Leopard? If so, the stationery in Xcode
> > 3 could easily use .xib.
>
> But Leopard -- Xcode 3 -- can easily be used to build projects
> targeted to Tiger.
I was under the impression xibs are "compiled" to nibs at build time.
If that's the case, why can't xibs be used to target Tiger?
> As well, Xcode 3 can open/build/edit Xcode 2.x
> projects without breaking compatibility.
How does that impact the Xcode 3 new project templates?
-- Finlay
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden