Lists

Open Menu Close Menu

Terms and Conditions
Lists hosted on this site
Email the Postmaster
Tips for posting to public mailing lists

Re: why aren't xibs the default?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: why aren't xibs the default?

Subject: Re: why aren't xibs the default?
From: Bill Bumgarner <email@hidden>
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2007 14:00:07 -0800

On Dec 9, 2007, at 1:02 PM, Rick Mann wrote:

They aren't the default because many people depend on building on a Tiger based machine.
That doesn't seem to make sense. Aren't .xibs an Xcode 3 feature, and doesn't Xcode 3 require Leopard? If so, the stationery in Xcode 3 could easily use .xib.

But Leopard -- Xcode 3 -- can easily be used to build projects targeted to Tiger. As well, Xcode 3 can open/build/edit Xcode 2.x projects without breaking compatibility.

b.bum

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


Follow-Ups:

Re: why aren't xibs the default?
From: "Finlay Dobbie" <email@hidden>


References:  
  >why aren't xibs the default? (From: Matt Neuburg <email@hidden>)
  >Re: why aren't xibs the default? (From: Jon Hess <email@hidden>)
  >Re: why aren't xibs the default? (From: Rick Mann <email@hidden>)




Prev by Date:
Re: NewApplication

Next by Date:
Re: why aren't xibs the default?

Previous by thread:
Re: why aren't xibs the default?

Next by thread:
Re: why aren't xibs the default?

Index(es):

Date
Thread