Re: maclife.de
Re: maclife.de
- Subject: Re: maclife.de
- From: Graeme Gill <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 13:07:36 +1000
Uli Zappe wrote:
So what I'd be missing in Argyll would be a perceptual intent just as
the one in ProfileMaker because
a) this makes it less prone to clipping
b) just "looks" more correct to my eyes; a mapping to L* 100 seems to
make the image artificially bright when compared to the scanned original
That's not the sort of workflow Argyll is intended for. The assumption
is that for minimum confusion, input spaces are colorimetric, so
that a coherent one step gamut mapping can be done from source
gamut to destination gamut, either in creating an output profile
or a device link. Throwing some sort of perceptual transform
into the input profile is rather un-defined, since the output
space is unknown at that point. It's also altogether cleaner
to relegate user preference adjustments to a separate step in
the workflow (eg. abstract profile), so that the device profile
doesn't have to be re-built every time the user changes
their preference.
Graeme Gill.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden