Re: AudioUnitHosting vs CocoaAUHost
Re: AudioUnitHosting vs CocoaAUHost
- Subject: Re: AudioUnitHosting vs CocoaAUHost
- From: Todd Blanchard <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 09:57:46 -0700
Except that most AUs still provide carbon UIs. I think it will be
awhile before they all support Cocoa. Check the AU's you plan to host
to help you decide.
-Todd Blanchard
On Mar 7, 2008, at 6:47 AM, tahome izwah wrote:
AudioUnit hosting means that you host AudioUnit plug ins (both Cocoa
and Carbon UI ones). CocoaAUHost only loads Cocoa UI AudioUnit plug
ins.
Since Carbon is a legacy technology and doesn't support 64bit Apple
recommends using Cocoa for the UI, so I guess this means that Cocoa AU
hosting is preferred for the years to come.
HTH,
--th
2008/3/7, Kevin Dixon <email@hidden>:
Hi,
I was wondering if anyone could gloss over the differences between
the
AudioUnitHosting example and the CocoaAUHost example. Is one the
"preferred" example?
I'm looking to write a small AU host that will use one AU to
analyze one
input file, and then use another AU to process other files, all
offline.
Any thoughts on which example would be more suited to being adapted
to
such a use?
Thanks!
-Kevin Dixon
Yano Signal Processing
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Coreaudio-api mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Coreaudio-api mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden