Re: Looks like ThinkSecret got some of the scoop on WO from WWDC'06
Re: Looks like ThinkSecret got some of the scoop on WO from WWDC'06
- Subject: Re: Looks like ThinkSecret got some of the scoop on WO from WWDC'06
- From: Paul Lynch <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 15:25:57 +0100
I am in FULL agreement with David Avendasora's post, which I pruned
from here.
On 28 Aug 2006, at 14:59, Miguel Arroz wrote:
But think on all the other solutions out there. J2EE has tools?
As far as I know, no. Everyone uses third-party Java IDEs. Ruby on
Rails has tools? Everyone uses TextMate or so. If apple pointed
WOLips as the "official" tools for WO, it would still be better
than with all those other tools - and those tools have success.
Interesting point. However, J2EE is a godawful mess, and was so from
the start; it is an examplar of what to avoid. Rails is designed
around the principle of "no configuration", or "programming by
convention", and so TextMate is the ideal IDE for it. WO config
files, eomodels and wods, are complex, and a decent GUI app is
essential. These would therefore have to be part of the officially
supported corpus (except that Apple are deprecating everything, and
have said that they won't officially support anything else).
Send Apple feedback with your concerns, so they may know what the
community feels.
Nah, Apple can read their own lists, just like everyone else.
Paul
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden