• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Thanks and Comments
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Thanks and Comments


  • Subject: Re: Thanks and Comments
  • From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 10:22:30 -0800

I doubt that there is any point to reverse engineering it now. It looks like EOModeler will be integrated into Xcode in the next release (or two) and there will no longer be any need for a back channel. I don't know if WOBuilder will go the same way, but I would expect so.

My current personal goal is co-existence. Use Xcode for tools support and things that it does best. Use Eclipse for the Java parts that it does best. I have several projects setup like this now. While it is a bit of a nuisance to get the Java files for components into the right place on the file system, this is not a task you do all that often. Eclipse determines the project contents based on what is in the file system so it works as long as new files are added via Xcode.

I don't expect that Xcode will ever be able to touch the Java functionality of Eclipse, IntelliJ, NetBeans, etc. I don't really think it is worth Apple's time to do so. Let them concentrate their expertise on the tools they do well.

Chuck


On Mar 23, 2006, at 10:09 AM, Arturo Perez wrote:

David LeBer wrote:
On 23-Mar-06, at 8:39 AM, Jerry W. Walker wrote:

Seriously, for all the good natured ribbing that goes back and forth, I, like Chuck and David, believe that Eclipse is currently a better platform for pure Java development. It is, after all, created in Java expressly for Java development. But WebObjects is not pure Java development. It includes WOComponents and EOModels.

I use Eclipse at work (non-WO) and I like it a lot. WOLips always had that "yeah, you can do everything in it except for the bit about using ProjectBuilder to do XYZ because it WOBuilder and EOModeller use a backchannel to update ZYX files." So I use Xcode for WO.

Has that backchannel been reversed engineered yet?

-arturo

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
40global-village.net


This email sent to email@hidden

--
Coming in 2006 - an introduction to web applications using WebObjects and Xcode http://www.global-village.net/wointro


Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific problems. http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects




_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden
References: 
 >Thanks and Comments (From: Jeffrey Pearson <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Thanks and Comments (From: David LeBer <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Thanks and Comments (From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Thanks and Comments (From: "Jerry W. Walker" <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Thanks and Comments (From: David LeBer <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Thanks and Comments (From: Arturo Perez <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Thanks and Comments
  • Next by Date: Problem of Building project converted from Objective C
  • Previous by thread: Re: Thanks and Comments
  • Next by thread: Re: Thanks and Comments
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread