Re: Xcode and Confidentiality (was: xcode 2.2 editor problem)
Re: Xcode and Confidentiality (was: xcode 2.2 editor problem)
- Subject: Re: Xcode and Confidentiality (was: xcode 2.2 editor problem)
- From: Gerben Wierda <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 22:30:43 +0100
On Nov 8, 2005, at 13:43, Greg Hurrell wrote:
El 08/11/2005, a las 0:45, Chris Espinosa escribió:
2.2DP1 is available to online members. Other seeds are available to
various other people according to their ADC status. But the key here
is that the existence of 2.2 is not under nondisclosure, so merely
mentioning the version number in a message on xcode-users is not a
violation of NDA, as several people here implied. But discussing the
details of 2.2 seeds is.
I have a general question about these seeds. I am only a small
developer, so I do all of my work on a single, production machine. I
don't have the luxury of a second "test" machine to install
pre-release seeds on. I almost exclusively only use final releases,
even though I would often *like* to do testing on pre-releases
(especially seeds of the OS itself) to make sure that my software
still works on it.
What stance do other developers in my situation adopt with respect to
trying out these new Xcode builds? I know that the use of pre-release
software is always a "use at your own risk" affair, but I'm wondering
how many decide to actually run that risk on their production
machines. Thoughts?
I generally use the latest version of XCode while using not the latest
of the OS. Reasons: problems with XCode generally are not serious
problems (just the program has a quirk, maybe) and generally there are
only improvements, you can revert easily enough (uninstall script and
reinstall official version).
G
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden