Re: FOGRA52 & i1Profiler [subject corrected]
Re: FOGRA52 & i1Profiler [subject corrected]
- Subject: Re: FOGRA52 & i1Profiler [subject corrected]
- From: Martin Orpen <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 14:33:20 +0100
> On 13 Sep 2017, at 13:59, Claas Bickeböller <email@hidden> wrote:
>
> can you confirm that the results you regarded as poor/unusable/disappointing
> are caused by the gamut mapping
> which you used before and have nothing to do with the quality of the FOGRA52
> data set?
>
> Just to bring back FOGRA52’s reputation ;-)
Claas
Yes, I think that this is a problem with the profile making tools I am using
rather than the data.
As the tools have always worked as expected prior to 51 & 52 it seemed likely
that the data was the issue...
But it looks now as if we need some additional features from X-Rite to solve
the problem in the subject line :)
Regards
--
Martin Orpen
[sent from an iOS device]
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden