Re: ICC White papers [was Re: Media Testing for maclife.de]
Re: ICC White papers [was Re: Media Testing for maclife.de]
- Subject: Re: ICC White papers [was Re: Media Testing for maclife.de]
- From: "edmund ronald" <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 17:52:15 +0200
Hmm, I may have typed a bit quickly here. The reviewers are usually
anonymous, but it's true that in many cases -not always- the authors
names are on the papers. Ad if they aren't one can usually figure out
pretty quickly from the citations which group the authors belong to.
Edmund
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 5:49 PM, edmund ronald <email@hidden> wrote:
> Bob,
>
> With colleagues, I set up an international conference called
> Artificial Evolution many years ago, and was involved for several
> years in the review process there as chair and proceeedings editor. I
> also reviewed for other conferences and international journals in my
> field, and submitted and published papers in US conferences and
> journals. As far as I know reviews in computer science are usually
> anonymous. I don't know about other fields.
>
> Edmund
>
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 5:32 PM, Bob Frost <email@hidden> wrote:
>> Graeme,
>>
>>> Typically journal articles are reviewed anonymously (so there is
>>> no chance of being impressed by an authors reputation, and the
>>> reviewers can say exactly what they think without fear of retribution).
>>
>> In that case, things have changed since I published papers, refereed papers,
>> and edited papers for publication in scientific journals.
>
> Edmund
>
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden