• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Mail Thread Index

Mail Thread Index

  • Date Index
[Prev Page][Next Page]
  • Re: 16 bits = 15 bits in Photoshop?, (continued)
      • Re: 16 bits = 15 bits in Photoshop?, bruce fraser
    • Re: 16 bits = 15 bits in Photoshop?, DMargulis
      • Re: 16 bits = 15 bits in Photoshop?, Ken Fleisher
        • Re: 16 bits = 15 bits in Photoshop?, email@hidden
          • Re: 16 bits = 15 bits in Photoshop?, Robert L Krawitz
      • RE: 16 bits = 15 bits in Photoshop?, michael shaffer
      • Re: 16 bits = 15 bits in Photoshop?, shinnecock
        • Re: 16 bits = 15 bits in Photoshop?, Martin Orpen
          • Re: 16 bits = 15 bits in Photoshop?, Ken Fleisher
    • Re: 16 bits = 15 bits in Photoshop?, Marco Ugolini
      • Re: 16 bits = 15 bits in Photoshop?, Jim Rich
    • Re: 16 bits = 15 bits in Photoshop?, DMargulis
      • Re: 16 bits = 15 bits in Photoshop?, bruce fraser
        • Re: Bruce and Dan are both right: was: 16 bits = 15 bits in Photoshop?, Ray Maxwell
          • Re: Bruce and Dan are both right: was: 16 bits = 15 bits in Photoshop?, email@hidden
            • Re: Bruce and Dan are both right: was: 16 bits = 15 bits in Photoshop?, Ray Maxwell
    • Re: 16 bits = 15 bits in Photoshop?, DMargulis
      • Re: 16 bits = 15 bits in Photoshop?, Dennis W. Manasco
        • Re: 16 bits = 15 bits in Photoshop?, bruce fraser
    • RE: 16 bits = 15 bits in Photoshop?, Tyler Boley
    • Re: 16 bits = 15 bits in Photoshop?, Marco Ugolini
    • Re: 16 bits = 15 bits in Photoshop?, Marco Ugolini
      • Re: 16 bits = 15 bits in Photoshop?, bruce fraser
        • Re: 16 bits = 15 bits in Photoshop?, Steve Upton
          • Re: 16 bits = 15 bits in Photoshop?, bruce fraser
            • Re: 16 bits = 15 bits in Photoshop?, Roger Breton
    • Re: 16 bits = 15 bits in Photoshop?, DMargulis
      • Re: 16 bits = 15 bits in Photoshop?, Roger Breton
    • Re: 16 bits = 15 bits in Photoshop?, DMargulis
    • Re: 16 bits = 15 bits in Photoshop?, DMargulis
    • Re: 16 bits = 15 bits in Photoshop?, Marco Ugolini
    • Re: 16 bits = 15 bits in Photoshop?, Marco Ugolini
    • Re: 16 bits = 15 bits in Photoshop?, Marco Ugolini
    • Re: 16 bits = 15 bits in Photoshop?, DMargulis
    • Re: 16 bits = 15 bits in Photoshop?, DMargulis
      • Re: 16 bits = 15 bits in Photoshop?, Marco Ugolini
    • Re: 16 bits = 15 bits in Photoshop?, DMargulis
    • Re: 16 bits = 15 bits in Photoshop?, Marco Ugolini
    • Re: 16 bits = 15 bits in Photoshop?, Marco Ugolini
      • Re: 16 bits = 15 bits in Photoshop?, Jim Rich
    • Re: 16 bits = 15 bits in Photoshop?, Marco Ugolini
      • Re: 16 bits = 15 bits in Photoshop?, Jim Rich
        • Re: 16 bits = 15 bits in Photoshop?, bruce fraser
          • Re: 16 bits = 15 bits in Photoshop?, Graeme Gill
    • Re: 16 bits = 15 bits in Photoshop?, Marco Ugolini
    • Re: 16 bits = 15 bits in Photoshop?, Jeff Schewe
      • Re: 16 bits = 15 bits in Photoshop?, Jim Rich
        • RE: 16 bits = 15 bits in Photoshop?, michael shaffer
    • RE: 16 bits = 15 bits in Photoshop?, Marco Ugolini
  • Colortrac 3680 scanner profiles, Simon Olding
  • New monitor suggestions?, Marci Fermier
  • ImagePrint for the R1800, ecohen
  • job posting, Newman, Alan
  • Re: losing Artisan calibration [solved], Said Nuseibeh
  • EyeOnePro with Ambiant diffuser, Roger Breton
    • <Possible follow-ups>
    • RE: EyeOnePro with Ambiant diffuser, Mike Eddington
  • EIZO / ColorEdge CG220, Dick Busher
    • Re: EIZO / ColorEdge CG220, Roger Breton
      • Re: EIZO / ColorEdge CG220, Thomas Richard
        • Re: EIZO / ColorEdge CG220, Roger Breton
          • Re: EIZO / ColorEdge CG220, Roger Breton
        • Re: EIZO / ColorEdge CG220, Roger Breton
    • <Possible follow-ups>
    • Re: EIZO / ColorEdge CG220, Rob Griffith
      • Re: EIZO / ColorEdge CG220, Thomas Richard
  • Epson 10600 & 9600 Printers, John Wickham
  • "Automatic" setting in Epson driver acting weird!, Eric Bullock
    • <Possible follow-ups>
    • Re: "Automatic" setting in Epson driver acting weird!, Eric Bullock
  • Gretag-MacBeth iQueue, Bob Dixon
    • Re: Gretag-MacBeth iQueue, Thomas Holm/Pixl
      • Re: Gretag-MacBeth iQueue, Bob Dixon
        • Quarks handling of color-managed images in pages saved as an EPS, Matt Nelson
          • Re: Quarks handling of color-managed images in pages saved as an EPS, Chris Murphy
            • OSX screen cap CM anomoly Cm3 vs Cm4, Doug Walker
              • Re: OSX screen cap CM anomoly Cm3 vs Cm4, Chris Murphy
              • Re: OSX screen cap CM anomoly Cm3 vs Cm4, Thomas Richard
  • Re: 32 bits in Photoshop?, Chris Cox
    • <Possible follow-ups>
    • Re: 32 bits in Photoshop?, Rich Apollo
      • Re: 32 bits in Photoshop?, email@hidden
    • Re: 32 bits in Photoshop?, Rich Apollo
      • Re: 32 bits in Photoshop?, email@hidden
      • Re: 32 bits in Photoshop?, Pablo Roufogalis L.
        • Re: 32 bits in Photoshop?, email@hidden
          • Re: 32 bits in Photoshop?, Pablo Roufogalis L.
            • Re: 32 bits in Photoshop?, email@hidden
  • Re: EIZO / ColorEdge CG220 ( and LaCie 321 vs Apple Cinema), Kamil Tresnak
    • <Possible follow-ups>
    • Re: EIZO / ColorEdge CG220 ( and LaCie 321 vs Apple Cinema), Mike Eddington
    • Re: EIZO / ColorEdge CG220 ( and LaCie 321 vs Apple Cinema), Kamil Tresnak
  • RE. "Automatic" setting in Epson driver acting weird!, robert . d . burbank
  • Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 2, Issue 150, Larry Wangelin
    • Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 2, Issue 150, bruce fraser
    • Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 2, Issue 150, Jim Rich
  • Re: 16 bit files, Peter Figen
  • 16 bits = 15 bits in Photoshop, roberto diego torrado
  • Re: DTP41 question, Neil Barstow
    • Re: DTP41 question, Raymond Cheydleur
  • RE: 8 bit vs. more bits, Mark Rice
    • Re: 8 bit vs. more bits, email@hidden
    • Re: 8 bit vs. more bits, email@hidden
    • Re: 8 bit vs. more bits, Robert L Krawitz
      • RE: 8 bit vs. more bits, Mark Rice